A Real-World Refining Cost Guide for Edible Oil Mills.

In our previous article on rapid edible oil refining, we explained in detail the working principles of our various refining equipment. They integrate different functional tanks to transform crude oil into a finished product with better appearance and flavor, more stable chemical properties, and easier marketability. Refining is not limited entirely to color and flavor improvement; it also removes free fatty acids (FFAs), moisture, insoluble impurities, gums, oxidation precursors, trace metals such as iron and copper, and odor-causing volatile compounds that compromise oil stability. At the same time, proper refining ensures compliance with food-grade safety standards, including limits on peroxide value, residual solvents, phospholipids, benzo-pyro impurities, and contaminants formed during storage or heating.
However, outside of all these more evident improvements, there lies the question which every oil producer must face in the light of these improvements: how much does refining truly cost? In most small and medium-sized oil-pressing mills in Southeast Asia, Africa and South America, this ratio of refining cost of edible oils to cost of refining machinery means success or failure of business. To understand this problem is the first step in attaining both quality and profit.

What Are the Main Cost Components of Edible Oil Refining?

While assisting medium-sized oil mills in Southeast Asia, Africa and South America, I have observed again and again that the question of the “cost of refining 1 ton of edible oil” arises, but a predominant concentration is on the first step of raw oil purchase with the balance of cost analysis neglected. Edible oil refining costs are determined by a combination of factors, including refining equipment costs, energy consumption, labor, raw materials, and routine maintenance and consumable costs.
When a peanut oil press in Senegal or coconut oil mill in Mindanao inquires “What is the cost of refining 1 ton of edible oil?” it is tempting to center the conversation about oil prices and bathing oil prices. But this question is only pertinent if the exploration includes capital investment in equipment, energy cost, labour cost, losses and maintenance. To ignore any of these vital elements is to remove a large piece of the profitibility puzzle.

Purchase of Refining Equipment.

The capital expense of the refining line fixes all other expenses . Depending on the depth of refining, whether degumming (degumming), deacidification (deacidification), bleaching (bleaching) and deodorisation (deodorisation) are included the nature and number of tanks needed, heat source systems, vacuum systems and automation control systems vary considerably. For example a semi-continuous 10 TPD refiner costs far less then a continuous 50 TPD refiner. According to industry data, the cost of refining equipment for small and medium-sized edible oil processing ranges from US$15,000.00 to US$500,000.00 depending on its capacities and configurations.
The appropriate choice of refining equipment size and arrangement to the particular feedstock, be it palm oil, peanut oil, soybean oil, coconut oil, sunflower oil or other crops of the region can allow the oil mills to maximize their investments in equipment, lower their refining losses and energy use, and finally reduce the total cost of refining edible oils.

Energy Cost.

This is one of the more significant continuing expenses. The refining process is energy dependent on use of electricity, steam, or fuel (for example a hot-oil furnace or boiler). During periods of high energy usage, for example deodorisation under high vacuum and temperatures, the energy consumption increases. In small and medium sized oil processing enterprises the selection of an optimum means of automation control and the implementation of an energy saving system (for example heat recovery from the deodoriser) can result in far lower energy costs per tonne. Higher automation levels result in higher heat recovery rates, significantly reducing energy consumption during large-scale edible oil refining.

Labour Costs.

Labour costs are closely tied to the degree of manual work that remains. A semi-automatic line may have a number of operators, whereas a fully automatic line will need only 1-2 technicians plus a person to do packaging or supervision. For example, a 10 TPD automated refining line may only need 1-2 operators plus one person for supervision, which reduces wages and supervision overheads by 30-50% compared to a more manual system. The reduced labour costs per tonne helps to reduce your edible oil refining cost.

Raw Material Losses & By-product Recovery.

Refining will always mean some loss, commonly spoken of as refining loss. This loss involves the soap stock that results from alkali neutralisation, the filtering loss from bleaching earth, loss through added volatile matter in deodorising, etc. The normal loss rate may be from 1-3% of the crude oil input. If you do not involve by-product recoveries (soap stock, etc., high-FFA acid oil) in computing the margin, you are losing offsets in cost. Advanced refining production lines can separate impurities, facilitating byproduct recovery and offsetting refining costs.

Maintenance and Consumables.

Consumables and maintenance are a silent cost driver: bleaching agents (active white earth or acid-activated clays), activated carbon, alkaline solutions, filter medium, suction pump servicing, tank linings repair and replacement, etc. For example, the consumption of bleaching earth may be 0.5-1.0 kg per tonne of oil treated. Fluctuations in the price of consumables and unexpected repair costs during maintenance can affect the overall cost of edible oil refining.

The following is a detailed breakdown of costs recorded from our follow-up visits to hundreds of customers’ edible oil refining production lines in different regions. Figures are used to show the average percentage of total refining cost per tonne, according to the various daily processing capacities.

Cost Breakdown by Refining Capacity (Typical % of Total Cost per Tonne)
Cost Item5 TPD Mini Line(Peanut / Soybean)20 TPD Standard Line(Palm / Peanut / Sunflower)50 TPD Medium Line(Palm / Soybean)
Equipment depreciation40%32%26%
Energy20%24%28%
Labour20%14%10%
Refining losses12%20%24%
Maintenance / Consumables8%10%12%

Smaller 5 TPD systems accrue greater depreciation and labour ratios due to allocation of the fixed cost over less tonnes. The optimum combination of capital cost and active efficiency of most regional mills is found in the A round 20 TPD. Bigger 50 TPD lines depreciate and labour shares less but exhibit greater energy consumption and refining losses percentages since they have greater temperature loads, greater vacuum systems, and longer deodorisation times.
Therefore, if entrepreneurs are meticulous enough, calculating edible oil refining costs involves more than simply considering the price difference between crude and finished oil. From the perspective of somebody working with reasonable-sized oil mills, the big idea is this: an oil refining equipment price does not stand alone—the other cost components (energy, labour, losses and maintenance) connect directly into it. Higher investment in the equipment usually means more automation and lower costs for labour and energy per ton—but this is only the case if you are able to operate the equipment efficiently with proper scaling for your crop and region. By laying out each of these cost components in detail, you will see clearly what your true edible oils refining cost is—and your margin opportunity.

The main cost components of edible oil refining
The main cost components of edible oil refining

Transform Crude to Premium Grade.

Now that you understand the cost structure, let’s talk solutions. Our customizable refining systems guide your crude oil through degumming, neutralization, bleaching, and deodorization—each step engineered to maximize your profit margins we discussed earlier. The beauty of our approach? We design around YOUR specific needs and budget constraints. Whether you’re processing soybean, sunflower, or canola oil, our refining equipment helps you capture that crucial price differential between crude and refined oil while controlling operational costs effectively.

How Does Crude Oil Quality Affect Refining Cost?

Following on from our discussion on the main costs of edible oil refining, it is important to also review the upstream side – the commodity itself. Every single drop of crude oil that enters your refining line possesses unique characteristics which determine how far and how well it must be refined. Crude oil quality directly affects refining costs, as purer and more stable crude oil requires less refining depth, resulting in lower energy, material, and refining time consumption, and producing higher-value finished edible oils.

Edible oil producers worldwide refine a wide variety of oils, including soybean oil, palm oil, peanut oil, sunflower oil, and even animal fats. These differences in raw materials directly determine the cost structure of edible oil refining equipment. Different crop types, and even different varieties of the same crop from different regions, have distinct requirements for each refining step.
To illustrate this point, crude palm oil has a higher than normal free fatty acid (FFA) material due to its fruit production chain and storage conditions. Peanut oil can contain higher levels of residue moisture and impurities if the seed preparation method is low. Soybean oil can use more of its content of phospholipids (gum) and therefore have an excess of water. Sesame oil has strong natural colourants and flavourants which need severe bleaching and deodorisation. Such characteristics of individual crops require changes in the downstream refining plant and processes in relation to which the increase in cost of the refining plant and the continuing costs per ton process are decided.

Different types of refined edible oils
Different types of refined edible oils

FFA, Moisture, Impurities: Direct Cost Drivers.

When high FFA contents are present in crude oil, the neutralisation or de-acidification process takes more caustic solution, has a longer period of contact, larger soap-foot formation and greater loss of oil. The FFA level is given in industry reports as “a statistically significant variable to obtain commercially acceptable values in the FFA content of palm oil” in refined palm oil.

High levels of moisture or impurities increase the work load of the degumming and deodorisation operations, i.e. the filters clog more quickly, consumption of bleaching earth increases, cycle time is longer – giving an increase in energy costs and labour and consumeables element of the product and packing. Strong pigment contents and odour precursors all cause deeper bleaching and more rigorous deodorisation (higher vacuum and steam consumption), giving a higher energy and higher refining loss. The correlation between impurity levels in crude oil and increased refining costs is well documented.

Imagine two batches of soybean crude oil: Batch A with FFA 2 % and Batch B with FFA 8 %. For Batch B the neutralisation step may consume 30 % more caustic soda, extend treatment time by 20 %, and add roughly 1 % extra oil loss through soap stock and carry-over. That additional oil loss and the extra treatment time increase the unit cost to refine 1 ton of edible oil significantly. When planning equipment investment and operating budget, the crude oil quality cannot be ignored—it dictates the depth of process and hence cost scaling.
In short, crude oil quality sets the tone for every refining stage. Oils having low FFA, low moisture, and very little impurity will require less energy, less salting and treatment with chemicals, and will give a larger yield with lower refinings per ton. On the other hand, low-grade oils mean larger costs for neutralization, bleaching and deodorization and these expenses will definitely also have their influence upon the profit and the life of the equipment. When the quality of the oil to be put into the plant has been determined, the next step is to consider the efficient means by which such refinings may be accomplished.

What Factors Influence the Price of Edible Oil Refining Equipment?

Once the essential cost components of the refining have been identified, we must review what the investment side is — the cost of the refining equipment. There are several component parts which combine together to determine the overall cost of installing a refining system. These are the material of construction, the required process configuration for refining equipment, the amount of automation, the production capacity, and the quality of the service provided by the vendor. Each of these factors has bearing not only on the original investment but also on the long-term cost of operation and efficiency. In practice, a refined plant carefully selected may save thousands of dollars during years of refining, but one that has been incorrectly selected will steadily rob the plant of profits.

  • Material Selection: Carbon Steel vs Stainless Steel.
    Material is a highly visible cost driver. Carbon steel equipment is economical but is not as resistant to corrosion as stainless steel and is suitable for the use of neutral or dry oils. Stainless steel (SS304 or SS316L) provides sanitary conditions, longevity, and resists damage from acidic and high FFA feedstocks such as palm and peanut oils. The refining equipment cost of stainless systems is greater than that of carbon, but they have a longer useful life, require fewer maintenance stops and will comply better with export requirements—particularly important for rapidly growing mills in the tropics.
    Generally, if the customer’s budget allows, we use all-stainless steel in the equipment. If the customer’s budget is limited, we use food-grade stainless steel for parts that come into contact with the oil. Other structural components are made of pressure-resistant carbon steel.
  • Process Configuration and System Design.
    The more complete the refining line the greater the cost. Systems that have degumming, deacidification, bleaching, deodorization, and sometimes winterization, will require more in the way of tanks for heat exchangers, and pumps, etc. The inclusion of a vacuum system, heat transfer oil furnace, and control by a PLC system, helps to assure that the system produced great stability and product quality but causes an increase in the initial investment. A modular system will allow for facility improvements over the years, a necessary consideration for mills which have plans for expansion.
    Our refining equipment can be flexibly customized turnkey solutions based on the customer’s budget and expected commercial grade of the finished oil. You can check out our best-selling small and medium-sized refining equipment combinations in this technical blog post, which can achieve different depths of refining.
  • Automation Level.
    Automation indicates how well your plant will operate with respect to daily operations. A semi-automatic line will require more trouble with valve operations, monitoring, and operator input. A fully automatic refining line will operate however with PLC central control, accurate temperature readings, automatic feeding and discharging systems. Even thought the refining equipment cost is higher, labor costs can be reduced, error potential lower, with better oil production per ton of feedstock.
    At GQ Agri, our fully automatic refining systems are designed for both ease of operation, yet correct product quality control even in small to medium mills, giving excellent efficiency with lack of complication.
  • Capacity (Throughput per Day).
    The importance of scale cannot be overstated. The cost of a 1 TPD pilot line pales into insignificance when compared to a 100 TPD commercial system. With increasing size comes greater diameters of tank, greater heating areas, larger vacuum pumps, and higher energy consumption etc. For instance, the cost of a small scale refining unit with a capacity of 5 TPD will, as a general rule, be far below the cost of a corresponding 20 TPD or 50 TPD plant, while the 100 TPD unit involves extra heavy construction, extra operator platforms and much higher grade automatically complexity. Careful choice of the scale will avoid the possibilities of excessive expenditure or limitation of production potential being suffered.
  • Supplier Service, Installation & After-Sales.
    The hardware aside, however, the technical service and local support of the supplier may make or mar his investment. A turnkey operation, covering design of plant layout, installation situation, commissioning, staff training and floating supply of spare parts may at first sight appear more expensive, but in reality a great deal of production risk and downtime is eliminated.
    In GQ Agri, turnkey service is in fact one of its value areas. We make sure that the refining line is running smoothly from the day of its installation and wherever the oil mill is located, whether in South East Asia or Africa or South America.
Case Comparison: Same Capacity, Different Setup.

For example, we can take two 30 TPD refining lines:

  • Line A has carbon steel tanks, partial automation.
  • Line B has all stainless steel, full PLC automation with turnkey installation.

While the price of Line B’s refining equipment may be 35 – 40 % more expensive, its uptime and labor requirements are better, while its oil yield over five years is better. Looking at the long-term unit refining cost per ton, it is now lower and hence improves profitability and competitiveness, especially in export-oriented operations.

The price of edible oil plant refining equipment is never indicated by one figure, it is the sum of the characteristics of materials used, classicism of process, automation, throughput, after sales service. The wise investment here means one payment for years of stability and efficiency.

Animal Fat Refining Equipment.

Animal fat refining demands more than standard vegetable oil systems. That’s why our animal fat refineries include advanced fractionation and dewaxing modules alongside the core refining processes. These specialized upgrades ensure your lard, tallow, or fish oil meets strict clarity and stability standards—essential for commanding premium market prices. Given the higher raw material costs in animal fat processing, this enhanced refinement capability directly impacts your bottom line profitability we analyzed above.

Unsure how to purchase the best refining equipment for you?

Get our expert guidance or seek free technical support from a GQ Agri engineer.

FAQ

The average cost of a small refining machine typically ranges from $1,800 to $100,000, depending on the size and configuration of the equipment. Prices vary widely, from basic manual units (priced around $1,800 to $15,000) to more integrated small production lines (priced between $10,000 and $30,000) to advanced automated systems (which can cost as much as $50,000 to over $100,000). The cost of edible oil refining equipment depends on the materials used (carbon steel or stainless steel), the level of automation, and whether processes such as degumming, deacidification, bleaching, and deodorization are included.

For a 10 TPD refining line with moderate automation about 2-4 operators would be needed, plus one supervisor. Because of the degree of automation, and controls (PLC systems, automated valves) the manual input of operators is reduced and a well designed line from a manufacturer such as GQ Agri can run easily with a minimum of labour and a freeing up of labour for other operations on the mill.

arArabic